Group Intervention Programs under OD
Quality of Work Life Program
a) Introduction:
One of the major problems facing the developing and the developed world is the quality of work life of a vast majority of employees engaged in productive pursuits. The concern is not just one of achieving greater human satisfaction but also improving productivity, adaptability and overall effectiveness of organizations. The quality of work life movement in a broader sense seeks to achieve integration among the technological, human, organizational and societal demands which are often contradictory and conflicting.
The quality of work life is not based on a particular theory. It does not advocate a particular technique for application. Instead, it is more concerned with the overall climate of work and the impact that the work has on people as on Organizational effectiveness. Direct participation of employees in problem- solving and decision making, particularly in areas related to their work is considered to be a necessary condition for providing greater autonomy and opportunity for self-direction and self- control. The recognized purpose is to change the climate at work so that the human – technological-organizational interface leads to a better quality of work life and eventually to an improved quality of life in community and society.
QWL is a step towards industrial democracy at shop floor. Several attempts to develop alternative forms of work organization have been made in India in various sectors of industries and service, the detailed accounts of which are available elsewhere. The need for redesigning work system in the light of adoption of new technology has been already highlighted in the preceding pages. Restructuring of work at shop floor level necessitates corresponding changes in the organization structure with emphasis on group as the building block and interdisciplinary teamwork.
b) Definition of QWL:
The American Society of Training and Development established a task force on the QWL way back in 1979. This task force defined QWL as “a process of work organizations which enables its members at all levels to actively participate in shaping the organizations” environment, methods and outcomes. This value based process is aimed towards meeting the twin goals of enhanced effectiveness of organization and improved quality of life at work for employees.”
Cohen and Rosenthal define QWL as an “internationally designed effort to bring about increased labor management cooperation to jointly solve the problem of improving organizational performance and employee satisfaction.
Having gone through above definitions of QWL, now QWL , in long and short’ can easily be defined as an approach concerned with the overall climate of work and the impact that the work has no people as well as on organizational effectiveness. Direct participation of employees in problem solving and decision making in areas related to their work helps upgrade the quality of life at work.
c) Evolution and Development of QWL Concepts
Like other concepts, evolution of QWL is also traced back to various phases in history. One such tracing is done by Walton by turning the pages of history of the last century. He reports that, in early 20th century, legislation was enacted to protect employees from job injury and to eliminate hazardous working conditions, on the one hand, and inauguration of unionization movement, on the other. Emphasis was given to work related conditions such as job-security, due process at the work place and economic gains for the worker. This was followed by propounding different theories by psychologists proposing a positive relationship between morale and productivity. They also tried to prove with research findings that harmonious human relations foster both morale and productivity. They also proposed reforms to acquire equal employment opportunities and job enrichment schemes.
It was against above background that finally in the 1970s, the idea of QWL was conceived. QWL was quite broader in sense and scope than these earlier stray developments mentioned above. Human values, needs and aspirations were at the heart of the concept of QWL.
This, it becomes clear that the basic concept underlying the QWL is what has come by now to be recognized as ‘humanization of work.” It gave genesis to the need for developing an overall work environment that stimulates the creative abilities of the workers, generates co-operations, and interest in self-growth. As a matter of fact, with growing awareness of work force, the realization and application of ‘humanization of work’ is on increasing. Truthfully speaking, it is this wide-spread realization of humanization of work that has made QWL a buzzword of the time. There is no looking back but to realize more and more how to make environment more and more humane.
d) Constituents of QWL
The most important constituents of QWL are as follows:
1. Adequate and Fair Compensation:
In brief, it refers to a just and fair balance between worker’s effort and reward out of it. In other words, it means whether compensation helps in maintaining a socially desirable standard of life and whether compensation bears an appropriate relationship to the pay received for other work. In India, for example, labor legislations like payment of Wages Act, 1936 and Minimum Wages Act, 1948 ensure adequate and fair compensation to the employees.
2. Safe and Healthy Working Conditions:
Factors like reasonable hour of work, Zero- risk physical conditions of work and age restrictions on both upper and lower side create safe and healthy working conditions. In India, once again, the Factories Act, 1948 enshrines minimum standards of protection from machine and other hazards such as noise, pollution, fume, gases, etc. at the place of work with a view to ensure safe and healthy working conditions.
(i) Opportunity to Use and develop Human Capacities:
One way to improve QWL is let the job allow sufficient autonomy and control, use of wider range of skills and abilities, provide immediate feedback to the worker to take corrective measures, and provide opportunity to plan and implement by workers themselves.
(ii) Opportunity to continued Growth and Security:
Here the focus is on career opportunities not on job itself. Opportunities available for growth of employees also contribute to improving QWL.
(iii) Social Integration in the Work Organization:
QWL is also aimed at generating sense of belonging to organization in which one works, on the hand, and developing of self-respect, on the other. Equal opportunities in employment irrespective of race, caste, creed, religion and sex are enshrined in Article 16 of the Indian Constitution.
(iv) Constitutionalisation in the Work Organization:
The constitutional guarantees such as right to personal privacy, free speech, equitable treatment, and governance by the “Rule of Law” are necessary to uphold to improve QWL.
(v) Work and the Total Life Space:
The demands of the work like late hours, frequent travel, quick transfers, etc., occurring on regular basis depress the employee, his or her family and QWL.
(vi) The Social Relevance of Work Life:
The discharge of social responsibility of business organization also contributes of QWL. On the contrary, lack of organization’s concern for social causes like waste disposal, low quality product, overaggressive marketing, etc. impinge upon self-esteem of workers.
e) QWL in the Indian contexts
It will not be less than correct to mention that, of late, QWL in Indian has emerged as a movement. It is the V>V> Giri National Institute of Labor which took an active lead in familiarizing the concept of QWL in India.
QWL in India seems in practice in a variety of operational systems like workers participation, job enrichment, quality circles, etc. Here, an attempt has been to give an overview of these in terms of their broad coverage and experiences of Indian Organizations with them.
i. Workers participation:
Workers participation is also known as Industrial democracy. The concept of participation means sharing, in an appropriate way, the decision- making powers with the lower levels in the organizations. The basic objective of workers participations is to make workers realize a sense of their importance, pride, freedom and opportunity for self-expression, a feeling of belongingness that help create industrial relations and congenital industrial peace.
ii. Job Enrichment:
Job enrichment refers to the process of making jobs more interesting, satisfying and challenging by adding new contents to jobs. Job enrichment is done through job redesign. In India, job redesign is based on experiments relating to socio- technical system made by Emery. Among the job redesign studies conducted in the Indian context, one of the most significant and off quoted study was conducted in Dynamo Corporation Limited by Professor Nitish De. The study diagnosed that the fragmented work system. Where everyone was concerned with his trade resulted in lack of emotional or rational commitment to the product, extensive forced idle time because of interdependence of tasks, and having done the same jobs for years, workers felt bored with the task and lacked a sense of challenge.
iii. Quality Circle:
The concept of quality circle (QC) originated in the Japanese soil in 1949 with the establishment of the Japanese Union of Scientists and Engineers as a concern for statistical quality control. QC is defined as a “small group of five to ten workers voluntarily performing quality control activities within the workshop to which they belong".
QC is marked by the following characteristics:
• It is group effort and not an individual effort.
• The participating members are volunteers.
• Their efforts are directed to improve quality within their shops or place of work.
• They meet frequently, often at company cost.
• They represent a cross-section of age, sex and positions in the organization.
• Their concern is to find ways and means to improve quality of their output. QC is formed to achieve the following main objectives:
-To improve and develop an organization.
-To develop respect for human- relations and induce job satisfaction and
-To deploy human capabilities to the fullest extent and draw out their infinite potential.
Grid Organizational Development
Managers differ in terms of the degree of concern that they have for production and people. Combination of these two concerns would give rise to a particular managerial style.
This managerial Grid style corresponds to Ohio (USA) state dimensions of consideration and initiating structure or the Michigan dimensions of employee orientation and production orientation. There are five leadership styles under this grid and they are briefly described below:
1. Impoverished management:
(1,1) has low concern for both production and people . Here leader “Excepts the minimum effort to get the required work done is appropriate to sustain Organization member. This style of management is similar to the laissez – faire style.
2. Country club management:
(1,9) has high concern for people but low concern for production. “Thoughtful action to needs of people for satisfying relationships leads to a comfortable friendly organization atmosphere and work temp”.
3. Task management:
(9,1) has high concern for production but low concern for people. “Efficiency in operations result from arranging conditions for work in such a way that human elements interfere to a min degree’. The style is similar to the autocratic style of leadership.
4. Team management:
(9,9) has high concern for both people and production. “Work accomplishment is from committed people.” Adequate organization performance is possible through balancing the necessary to get the work done while maintaining morale of people at a satisfactory level.
5. Organizational management:
(5,5) Adequate organization performance is possible through balancing the necessity to get the work done while maintaining morale of people at satisfactory level. This has been shown in the grid at 5,5. The leaders of this style have medium concern for both people and production and try to maintain a balance in two.
The emerging Organizational Development Techniques and Approaches
Emergent Principles of Organizational Design
In response to far- reaching changes in the contextual factors affecting businesses, a number of organizations has been experimenting with innovative approaches to structure, systems, strategy, resource allocation and human resource management. These experiments however have not culminated in a definite form applicable to organizations striving to find ways and means to grapple with increasing turbulence in the environment. The forms are evolving as organizations explore viable options to withstand pressures of change. This has led to the development of at least new perspectives on management necessitated by paradigmatic shift in the world of business.
The emergent principles of design will affect various aspects of organization and management as depicted in table below.
|
|
Conventional Principles |
|
Emerging Principles |
Vision/Mission Strategy Systems Structure Culture People |
|
Stable over a longer time Span planned/top down Control focused Pre-determined/fixed Strong/monolithic Organization/whole-oriented |
|
Shifting over a shorter time span Evolving/bottom-up Responsiveness focused Emergent/flexible Weak/pluralistic Individual/part-oriented |
The characteristics of organization designed on the basis of Emergent Principle
With increasing uncertainties in the environment, the envisioning process and the articulation of mission will entail shorter time span on account of frequent shifts in technological breakthroughs and market conditions. In an attempt to continually bridge the gap between strategies and their execution, the planned/top down approach will be supplemented if not replaced by bottom-up approach with active involvement of employees. Strategies, thus, would evolve from the experiences and tacit knowledge of organization members and other stakeholders.
• The organization model of the future will go beyond functional, divisional, matrix and network organizations and will involve alliances , spin- offs and federations that is, organizations operating more in virtual structures with large degrees of self-management and self-directing teams.
• Organization will be heavily dependent on information management. Supply chains will be characterized by cooperative relations between companies through joint ventures, strategic alliances and partnerships.
• Similarly, corporate borders are becoming more blurred as interlinked” ecosystems” of suppliers, producers, and customers emerge. Even basic structural assumptions are being changed. For example, the emergence of robust private equity financing is changing corporate ownership, lifecycles, and performance expectations. Winning companies, using efficiencies gained by new structural possibilities, will capitalize on these transformations.
• Bigger, more complex companies demand new tools to run and manage them. Indeed, improved technology and statistical- control tools have given rise to new management approaches that make even mega- institutions viable.
• Long gone is the day of the “gut instinct” management style. Today’s business leaders are adopting algorithmic decision-making techniques and using highly sophisticated software to run their organizations. Scientific management is moving from a skill that create competitive advantages to an ante that gives companies the right to play the game.
• The hierarchical structure may be retained, but many important decisions will be delegated with relatively little operational supervision. Performance measurements rather than supervision to get the most from self- directed teams of professionals will be emphasized.
• People will elect their leaders. In Mondragon Corporation, which is organized as a collection of over 150 small cooperatives, employees vote for the board of directors and also on important choices before the company.
As organizations strive towards creating futures for their continued existence, the established organizational processes need to be flexible enough to accommodate the new changes. It thus requires adoption of transformational approach to change involving redesign of structures and mental models.
Various contents and transformational approaches to be incorporated into the emerging approaches of OD
1. Incorporate future into the present:
Change is facilitated when organization members are able to incorporate future concerns into their current work. This can be achieved by constituting teams which have both present and future- oriented employees. Also, low- cost experiments with new idea can be entirely new products.
2. Continuous Learning:
In organizations that are increasingly becoming knowledge based accessing knowledge from variety of internal and external sources and managing it enables them to respond and innovate at greater speed. Organizations must create and reinforce a learning and information sharing orientation.
3. Support day-to-day innovation and change:
Many innovations and changes occur on day-to-day basis in teams, on shop floors or in the field, Change- friendly organizations actively support these efforts so that employees are encouraged to think and adopt innovative practices in their products, work processes and services.
4. Leverage diversity:
When people with diverse experiences, expertise and time orientation that is present and future oriented are brought together in a team, they are able to bring in different perspectives to future concerns. Change thus is facilitated if the diversity is leveraged to set new directions leading to innovations. Synergizing the conflicting ideas and views of team members to achieve a common purpose is however a challenge that team members must address constructively.
5. Encourage mavericks:
The mavericks stand for radical change and thus are not part of the mainstream. They are risk takers and often experiment with new ideas and approaches. They are usually sidelined and ignored as they disturb the status quo and question the existing system. They are therefore change champions who must be encouraged to create an environment of entrepreneurship in the organization thereby facilitating organizational transformation.
6. Shelter breakthroughs:
As the existing organization set up is designed to deal with tasks in the conventional way, any breakthroughs that occur are rejected by the system. It may thus be necessary to create a new organization to provide shelter to the breakthrough innovations. Change friendly organizations institutionalize the process by routinely creating small independent units with their own budgets, suppliers, markets and cultures.
7. Provide IT-enabled support:
It – enabled support system must be created to facilitate the change process. In a study being undertaken globally, it has been found that of all factors reviewed; only IT had a significant and positive relationship with performance. The positive impact of IT cab be felt only when it is integrated with other changes in organizations structure and processes. For example, networked organization can function efficiently if it is supported by IT- enabled support system for coordination and control.
8. Develop trust:
Employees are likely to embrace changes when they have trust in thee change agents. The change leaders must be perceived as persons with high credibility and they should demonstrate this in their actions and behaviors. Trust and credibility provide legitimacy to change efforts which in turn reduces likely resistance on the part of employees. Downsizing for example, eroded trust and makes the future change initiatives difficult to implement. Trust has to be built and nurtured as it provides basis for people to respond readily and positively to change efforts.
Summary
In a hyper competitive business environment, incremental and evolutionary changes in organizations are necessary but not sufficient conditions for survival and growth. Most organizations across the globe are attempting to transform the ways they used to conduct their businesses and relate to stakeholders. Transformation involves fundamental changes in the strategic intent, structures, process and culture of the organization. It includes change programs aimed at revitalizing the organization to withstand processes generated by highly turbulent environment. The emerging techniques described above will have to be bent by the organizational managers to suit their own organizational needs to bring out the best in the skills of the workers towards to achievement of targeted goals.